How Much Does It Cost to Build a High School Gymnasium Performing Arts Center

The School Board approved the schematic design in December 2015 and the educational specifications on May 26, 2016. To minimize student disruption, shorten the construction time and meliorate the overall design, the program calls for building the new schoolhouse where the front end parking lot and baseball fields are currently located. To continue to focus support for freshmen during their transition twelvemonth into high school, a new freshman building is part of the new schoolhouse. To compare the new pattern with the electric current footprint of the Mount Si High Schoolhouse, scroll to the bottom of the page for an aerial photo of the present-twenty-four hour period school.

This image shows the approved high school design site plan. The Performing Arts Center (PAC) (light blue, at top) and the gymnasium (turquoise) volition offering easy access to the public and both can be closed off from the rest of the building during community use. The balance of the edifice volition run along Meadowbrook Avenue, with the main entrance located where the large purple building is indicated. The purple buildings = administrative/counseling areas, dark orange = Career Technical Educational activity (CTE) classrooms, light orange = academic classroom areas; dark gray = life skills classes; light gray = kitchen/culinary arts surface area; off white = mutual areas/ lunchrooms; and, greenish = outdoor spaces. The separate building on the far right is the new Freshman Campus, created to continue focused support for students transitioning into high school; information technology will also have a principal entrance and parent drib-off area. In improver to the parking lots shown above, parking will be created on the ground level underneath the bulk of the school, with the exception of the PAC. The stadium, runway and tennis courts will remain in their current locations.

The new facility is existence expanded to 355,000 square feet, compared to the current school that is 224,000 square feet. The buildings will be elevated in a higher place floodway levels, with three-story buildings on peak of basis-level parking, with natural lighting and sweeping views of the surrounding mountains. The elevated pattern of the edifice also serves to improve the Commune's ability to monitor and restrict admission to the school when in session, improving overall student safety and security. The schoolhouse is also being designed with an open media area/library for student collaboration, wide hallways, multiple common areas/lunch rooms, more science and lab spaces, flexible Career and Technical Education (CTE) spaces, a roof-top green business firm, and unique outdoor spaces utilized throughout the campus.

The rendering above shows the front end bird's centre view of the new pattern. From this view, the Performing Arts Center is on the left; the gym is in the middle; next to the main entrance of the school, with the media area in a higher place the front offices. The bulk of the school runs along Meadowbrook Way, with the Freshman Campus at the north end.

Design Elements:

External materials for the new school were selected by the High School Design Committee, comprised of students, staff, parents and administrators. Durable, depression maintenance materials were selected to assistance withstand climate factors and to save on costs of upkeep over time. The materials include corrugated steel siding, and fiber cement/composite panels in corresponding shades of lighter and darker gray, plus warm emphasis colors using fabric that looks like forest, only is really made of steel. The Design Team also selected trim color of terracotta to complement the exterior materials.

Materials palette for outside the new high school

Renderings of the new Mount Si High School schematic pattern with terracotta colored trim.

Design Findings and Cost Implications:
Further study on the design cost estimate has confirmed that the original upkeep is on track to attain the original building scope defined in the school bond.

In add-on, a few unanticipated items were identified during the engineer and pattern procedure and boosted structural studies. The following four projects were approved by the School Board, adding to the long-term value of the school as a community resource:
- Edifice a new Gymnasium complex, rather than renovating the old (see caption below)
- Expansion of originally anticipated foundation organization – required to encounter new building code and address soil conditions.
- Incorporating artificial turf and lights to the relocated baseball game and softball fields – to increase yr-circular, multi-sport use of fields and help run into the needs of the community and overall expanded student capacity.
- Planning for future expansion – Past prepping function of the platform foundation now (the open space located side by side to the new freshman campus edifice), the Commune would have space on campus that it could leverage, if needed for future enrollment. This grooming includes boosted parking that would exist required to serve upwards to 300 more students, if needed. This decision to plan ahead now will save costs and reduce disruption to future students; Information technology too takes into consideration that the school'southward elevated pattern volition not easily accommodate adding portables to parking lots, as the school has in the past when actress space was needed.
New Gym Approved for New Building Codes, Seismic Safety: Afterwards the conceptual design for the high school was canonical final June, architects worked on developing the schematic design of the school which involved more in-depth study of the building's needs. This included a structural engineering analysis and soil testing under the gymnasium, to make up one's mind the scope of work needed to run into standards required by new, more stringent edifice codes and to ensure seismic safety of a gym renovation. The analysis determined that, while the planned gym renovation could meet new code requirements related to life safety, the gym would likely need significant repairs after a large seismic outcome, due to the soil weather deep below the gym. After NAC Architecture presented its findings and potential options to the Commune in August, the District recommended building a new gym, rather than renovating the old gym, to provide a safer, longer-term investment for the community. The School Board approved this programme revision on September 10, 2015.

Cost of unanticipated projects: Costs for the original scope of the $188 million schoolhouse rebuild and expansion, every bit defined in the bond, remain inside the budget. For the iv unanticipated scope changes described above, the architects estimate a possible cost of upwards to $twenty million. The Commune qualified for $vii 1000000 in country matching funds related to the new Elementary School construction. Also, the high school rebuild project volition qualify for state matching funds estimated at approximately $20-21 million. During bond planning, these funds were gear up aside to address unanticipated changes that can emerge during construction projects. Unused state matching funds at the conclusion of the project will be used to aid pay down the bond debt and save taxpayers money.

Designing the High Schoolhouse: Planning started with the High School Educational Visioning Process that took place from October 2014-February 2015 to identify cardinal priorities for a new school pattern. During this fourth dimension, a committee of nigh 35 high schoolhouse staff, students, parents and administrators studied how a new building could best serve all students and their learning needs. Their work resulted in consensus around some central educational concepts that would help guide the design work to follow.

Shortly after the bail was approved, another group was assembled to serve as the High School Design Squad. This grouping was comprised of approximately 40 participants including: 10-12 teachers representing a wide range of subjects in the loftier school; 10 students spanning eighth-11th grades; ix PTSA presidents or designees representing parents from every school in the Commune; iv high schoolhouse administrators and secretaries; ii assistant superintendents; plus architects and school construction experts.

The High Schoolhouse Blueprint Team began their work by edifice upon the priorities identified during the High Schoolhouse Educational Visioning Process. Starting in March of 2015, the Design Squad visited several other schools, and met regularly with the architects to develop the new loftier school design for our community. The team considered the results of the jump 2015 Thoughtexchange date activity which solicited input from staff, students, parents and customs members on the design concepts. The Design Team also engaged with high school staff throughout the process, earlier reaching agreement on their conceptual design recommendation for the high school in June.
Community appointment has played an important role in the process, especially during the early on planning phase, before decisions were made. Ii opportunities were offered for the public to learn more and share their ideas to help guide the Design Team'due south decisions:
- A Customs Meeting on Apr 2, 2015, provided an update on timelines, the visioning work, and the Design Squad'due south efforts to date, as well as an opportunity for attendees to ask questions and contribute ideas. (View the April 2 Presentation.)
- The District also initiated an online engagement activeness called Thoughtexchange in March-April of 2015 that invited people to openly share their ideas, concerns and hopes for a new design. The activity provided an easy-to-use process by which people were able to review others' comments and assist prioritize (star) the ideas they liked best. This analysis helped the Design Team sympathize the shared values and priorities that emerged from the customs for their design planning. Click on the prototype beneath for the jump 2015 Thoughtexchange results.
Blueprint Team Updates:
- Executive Summary from NAC Architects, as of May twenty, 2015
- Total report from NAC Architects, May 20, 2015 (71 pages)
- Executive Summary from NAC Architects, every bit of Apr 29
- Full report from NAC Architects, as of April 29, 2015 (67 pages with photos)
- Executive Summary from NAC Architects, every bit of April 15, 2015
- Total report from NAC Architects, as of Apr 15, 2015 (64 pages with photos)
Conceptual Blueprint Approved for a New Mount Si High School: On June 25, 2015, the Schoolhouse Board approved the conceptual blueprint for the Mount Si High School renovation and expansion, as recommended past the High Schoolhouse Design Team. And so in September, a revision to the pattern was approved which involved edifice a new gym as opposed to renovating the old. This revision switched the locations of the gym and Performing Arts Center (in the original plan). With the canonical plan, students will exist able to keep to use the former gym until the new gym is synthetic, and likewise, students will be able to use the current auditorium, until the new PAC is completed. This is an comeback from the original programme, which would have taken the existing gym out of service for periods of fourth dimension during structure.

Come across the approved site plan, posted at the elevation of this webpage, for the final conceptual design.

The approved pattern concept allows for a much shorter construction period and significantly less disruption than was initially estimated for plans to build a school on the aforementioned footprint every bit the electric current schoolhouse. Instead of having to "stage" construction over five years, ending in 2022, the approved blueprint concept will allow all students and staff to be served in new school buildings past 2019.

Slide testify of photos from the Customs Meeting and Pattern Team work sessions

Electric current aerial view of Mount Si High School